GM Logo
  • Active Access Contact Info
  • Active Access
  • Help
  • Automotive portals
    • Adient Automotive portal
    • Delphi Technologies portal
    • Ford Supplier Portal
    • Jaguar Land Rover Portal
    • Lordstown Motor Supplier portal
    • Mitsubishi Supplier Portal
    • OV SupplyPower Portal
    • Support Portal
    • GM SupplyPower
  • English (EN)
  • Español (ES)
  • Français (FR)
  • Deutsch (DE)
  • 日本語 (JA)
  • 한국어 (KO)
  • Português (PT)
  • 中文 (CN)
  • Svenska (SE)
  • DOMICILE
  • RELIER
    • Supplier Business Meeting
    • News & Updates
      • Executive Corner
      • GM Marketing/Communications
    • User Directory
  • PARTENAIRE
    • Learn About GM
    • GPSC Core Priorities
    • GM Supplier Diversity
    • Vehicle Programs
      • General Motors Fleet
      • GM Certified Pre-owned Vehicles
      • GM Supplier Discount
  • COLLABORER
    • Applications
    • Bulletins
    • Document Library
    • Global Extended Enterprise Services (GEES)
    • GPSC Supplier Training
  • SE CONFORMER
    • 2-Step Verification Profile
    • Conflict Minerals
    • Cyber Safety
    • Dangerous Goods
    • General Terms & Conditions
    • Global Supplier Publicity Guidelines
    • GM SupplyPower Audits
    • GM Sustainability Report
    • IAFT 16949 Auditing
    • Supplier Sustainability
    • Supplier Visibility & Contact Info
  • AUTRES
    • AIAG
    • Awareline
    • CMS/Supplier Portal
    • ASN Checker
    • DPV
    • MFA
    • My Fav
    • Polls
  • demo
  • DOMICILE
  • RELIER
    • Supplier Business Meeting
    • News & Updates
      • Executive Corner
      • GM Marketing/Communications
    • User Directory
  • PARTENAIRE
    • Learn About GM
    • GPSC Core Priorities
    • GM Supplier Diversity
    • Vehicle Programs
      • General Motors Fleet
      • GM Certified Pre-owned Vehicles
      • GM Supplier Discount
  • COLLABORER
    • Applications
    • Bulletins
    • Document Library
    • Global Extended Enterprise Services (GEES)
    • GPSC Supplier Training
  • SE CONFORMER
    • 2-Step Verification Profile
    • Conflict Minerals
    • Cyber Safety
    • Dangerous Goods
    • General Terms & Conditions
    • Global Supplier Publicity Guidelines
    • GM SupplyPower Audits
    • GM Sustainability Report
    • IAFT 16949 Auditing
    • Supplier Sustainability
    • Supplier Visibility & Contact Info
  • AUTRES
    • AIAG
    • Awareline
    • CMS/Supplier Portal
    • ASN Checker
    • DPV
    • MFA
    • My Fav
    • Polls
  • demo
  • Active Access Contact Info
  • Active Access
  • Help
  • Automotive portals
    • Adient Automotive portal
    • Delphi Technologies portal
    • Ford Supplier Portal
    • Jaguar Land Rover Portal
    • Lordstown Motor Supplier portal
    • Mitsubishi Supplier Portal
    • OV SupplyPower Portal
    • Support Portal
    • GM SupplyPower
  • GMIN : NA
  • GMID : NA
  • Administration Tool
  • Change Password
  • My Profile
  • My Administrators
Executive Corner
Shilpan A. Amin
  • Shilpan A. Amin
  • Kimberly (Kim) J. Brycz
  • GM - Mary T. Barra

Shilpan A. Amin, Vice President

Shilpan A. Amin is vice president, GM Global Purchasing and Supply Chain (GPSC), a position he has held since November 2019. Amin is responsible for the strategic direction of GM''s worldwide purchasing, supply chain and logistics operations. Drawing on extensive technical expertise as a leader in purchasing and engineering, he is focused on collaborating with GM''s 20,000 global suppliers to deliver exceptional vehicle quality, innovation and value to GM customers. Prior to this role, Amin was executive director of Global Purchasing Interiors and Exteriors for General Motors where he led a team of 200 members and more than 600 suppliers. Amin began his career with GM in 1996 as a product engineer in advanced product development for steering systems. He has held various leadership roles within GM''s vehicle engineering and Global Purchasing and Supply Chain organizations, including executive director of Global Purchasing and Supply Chain Program Management and executive director Global Propulsion Systems Engineering Vehicle Integration and Operations. Amin is on the external Board of Directors for the Pontiac Regional Chamber as well as the Asian Pacific American Chamber of Commerce. He serves on the Leadership Advisory Board for the General Motors Asian Connections Business Resource Group. He previously served on the Board of Directors for General Motors Global Propulsion Systems Venture Capital and continues to lead the Forward Marine project to use GM''s electrification technology leadership to transform the marine industry. He has earned a Transformational Leadership certificate from Stanford University's Graduate School of Business and holds two advanced degrees: a master's degree in engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an MBA from the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business. He earned his bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University.

Send Email

MEssages

GM Careers

January 15, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders.

GM Careers

January 15, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders.

GM Marketing

January 13, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders. GM announced this week it would wind down sales, design and engineering operations in Australia and New Zealand and retire the Holden brand by 2021. The company will focus its strategies for the market on the GM specialty vehicle business. The company also announced that it had signed a binding term sheet with Great Wall Motors to purchase GM''s Rayong vehicle manufacturing facility in Thailand; and would withdraw Chevrolet from the domestic market in Thailand by the end of 2020. GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders. GM announced this week it would wind down sales, design and engineering operations in Australia and New Zealand and retire the Holden brand by 2021. The company will focus its strategies for the market on the GM specialty vehicle business. The company also announced that it had signed a binding term sheet with Great Wall Motors to purchase GM''s Rayong vehicle manufacturing facility in Thailand; and would withdraw Chevrolet from the domestic market in Thailand by the end of 2020.

GM Marketing

January 13, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders. GM announced this week it would wind down sales, design and engineering operations in Australia and New Zealand and retire the Holden brand by 2021. The company will focus its strategies for the market on the GM specialty vehicle business. The company also announced that it had signed a binding term sheet with Great Wall Motors to purchase GM''s Rayong vehicle manufacturing facility in Thailand; and would withdraw Chevrolet from the domestic market in Thailand by the end of 2020. GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders. GM announced this week it would wind down sales, design and engineering operations in Australia and New Zealand and retire the Holden brand by 2021. The company will focus its strategies for the market on the GM specialty vehicle business. The company also announced that it had signed a binding term sheet with Great Wall Motors to purchase GM''s Rayong vehicle manufacturing facility in Thailand; and would withdraw Chevrolet from the domestic market in Thailand by the end of 2020.

GM Investment

January 07, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders.

GM Investment

January 07, 2021

GM is taking decisive action to transform its international operations, building on the comprehensive strategy it laid out in 2015 to strengthen its core business, drive significant cost efficiencies and take action in markets that cannot earn an adequate return for shareholders.

Kimberly (Kim) J. Brycz, Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources

Kimberly (Kim) J. Brycz was appointed to the position of senior vice president, Global Human Resources in March 2018. In this role, she leads an HR team and systems that build enterprise-wide employee engagement, develop talent and support strategic planning at all levels.

Previously, Brycz served as executive director, Global Product Purchasing, where she oversaw GM’s $80 billion annual global product spend as well as Customer Care and Aftersales purchasing. Brycz was instrumental in transforming supplier relationships by providing strategic solutions to future sourcing and supplier engagement.

Brycz, a native of Detroit, began her GM career in 1983 with the Cadillac Motor Car Division in Detroit. Since then she has held various positions in GM’s Global Purchasing organization, including the Global Purchasing lead for electrical systems, batteries and hybrids, and interiors. Prior to her most recent role, Brycz served as executive director, Global Purchasing, Indirect Materials, Machinery and Equipment.

Brycz received her Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Michigan State University. In 2010 and 2015 she was named one of the 100 Leading Women in the North American Auto Industry by Automotive News. She is an active leader on two of GM’s employee resource groups, participating on the executive boards for the GM Asian Connections and GM Women groups. She is also a founding member of GM’s Inclusion Advisory Board. Additionally, Brycz has served as the GM executive champion sponsor for Making Strides Against Breast Cancer.

Send Email

GM Messages

Message - 10

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 10

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 9

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 9

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 8

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 8

June 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 7

May 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 7

May 07, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 6

May 06, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 6

May 06, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 5

May 05, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 5

May 05, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 4

April 04, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 4

April 04, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 3

April 03, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 3

April 03, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 2

April 02, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 2

April 02, 2021

Use Moderated Instead of Unmoderated Studies

In remote unmoderated studies, participants work on their own, with no facilitator present. Even though this variation of usability testing is cheaper, we recommend that you do not use it for content studies. When trying to discover how people research a topic, compare offerings, and make decisions, the best approach is to conduct a moderated study, where a facilitator is present (physically or remotely). 

Facilitators can ensure that participants process the content naturalistically instead of approaching the task superficially. 

Content studies tend to have long stretches of time when the user is simply scanning page after page—in silence. When left alone (such as in a remote unmoderated test), participants may feel awkward and wonder whether they’re helpful. Without proper feedback and reassurance, participants may rush through the test and approach the task in  superficial manner. This behavior is often reinforced by the shorter session times common in unmoderated testing (typically 20–30 minutes).

Message - 1

April 01, 2021

As the researcher or facilitator, you should be extremely familiar with the content you will test and with the domain it belongs to. This is particularly important for people working for agencies, since they may be new to the content area. 

For example, let’s imagine we were hired to test the content on Investopedia.com, a site that provides investment news as well as explanations of complex financial concepts written for different experience levels.  We’d need to start by spending hours just to explore the site: learning the types of content offered, the target audience(s), and as much as possible about the content. This latter type of knowledge would be particularly important if we weren’t already very familiar with finance or investment.

We’d want to also spend time with the content creators, as well as subject matter experts. As a researcher, you don’t need to become an expert in the topic (investment), but you do need to have a rough idea of what your participants are reading.

Message - 1

April 01, 2021

As the researcher or facilitator, you should be extremely familiar with the content you will test and with the domain it belongs to. This is particularly important for people working for agencies, since they may be new to the content area. 

For example, let’s imagine we were hired to test the content on Investopedia.com, a site that provides investment news as well as explanations of complex financial concepts written for different experience levels.  We’d need to start by spending hours just to explore the site: learning the types of content offered, the target audience(s), and as much as possible about the content. This latter type of knowledge would be particularly important if we weren’t already very familiar with finance or investment.

We’d want to also spend time with the content creators, as well as subject matter experts. As a researcher, you don’t need to become an expert in the topic (investment), but you do need to have a rough idea of what your participants are reading.

GM - Mary T. Barra, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer - Test

Mary Barra is Chair and Chief Executive Officer of General Motors. She was elected Chair of the GM Board of Directors on Jan. 4, 2016, and has served as CEO of GM since Jan. 15, 2014.

Under Barra’s leadership, GM envisions a world with zero crashes, to save lives; zero emissions, so future generations can inherit a healthier planet; and zero congestion, so customers get back a precious commodity – time.

She is focused on improving the customer experience and strengthening GM’s core vehicle and services business, while also working to lead the transformation of personal mobility through advanced technologies like connectivity, electrification and autonomous driving.

Prior to becoming CEO, Barra served as GM executive vice president, Global Product Development, Purchasing and Supply Chain since August 2013, and as senior vice president, Global Product Development since February 2011. In these roles, Barra and her teams were responsible for the design, engineering and quality of GM vehicle launches worldwide.

Previously, she served as vice president, Global Human Resources; vice president, Global Manufacturing Engineering; plant manager, Detroit Hamtramck Assembly; and in several other executive engineering and staff positions.

Barra began her career with GM in 1980 as a General Motors Institute (Kettering University) co-op student at the Pontiac Motor Division. She graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering in 1985, followed by a Master of Business Administration from the Stanford Graduate School of Business in 1990.

Barra serves on the Board of Directors of the Walt Disney Company, the Duke University Board of Trustees and the Detroit Economic Club.

Additionally, she serves as the Chair and founding member of GM’s Inclusion Advisory Board. She is also a member of The Business Council and a Board Member of the Business Roundtable, where she chairs the Education and Workforce Committee and a subcommittee by the same name for the Special Board Committee on Racial Equity and Justice.

Send Email

Related Messages

Electrification - Updated

April 20, 2021

Updated - Electrifying Engineering episodes, which will be released every Sunday in English and Spanish through July 2020, are hosted by members of the GM team and will delve into a wide range of topics, including electric car charging, electric car motors, autonomous vehicle sensors and more. Each episode will feature an interactive engineering project designed for viewers to conduct in the comfort of their own homes, with everyday household items.

When the project is complete, viewers are encouraged to share a picture on social media using the hashtag #ElectrifyingEngineering.

As we all juggle changes to how we work and spend time with family, we hope to share what we hold to be true at General Motors – creativity and innovation know no bounds. From teachers finding new ways to stay in touch with their students, to automakers retooling plants to produce critical healthcare supplies, we’re all stepping up to face the challenge together.

It is possible to make a difference and we hope these videos will inspire the young, budding engineers of the future to help us reach our zero-zero-zero vision.

To learn about joining the GM team, visit our careers website.

]]>

Electrification - Updated

April 20, 2021

Updated - Electrifying Engineering episodes, which will be released every Sunday in English and Spanish through July 2020, are hosted by members of the GM team and will delve into a wide range of topics, including electric car charging, electric car motors, autonomous vehicle sensors and more. Each episode will feature an interactive engineering project designed for viewers to conduct in the comfort of their own homes, with everyday household items.

When the project is complete, viewers are encouraged to share a picture on social media using the hashtag #ElectrifyingEngineering.

As we all juggle changes to how we work and spend time with family, we hope to share what we hold to be true at General Motors – creativity and innovation know no bounds. From teachers finding new ways to stay in touch with their students, to automakers retooling plants to produce critical healthcare supplies, we’re all stepping up to face the challenge together.

It is possible to make a difference and we hope these videos will inspire the young, budding engineers of the future to help us reach our zero-zero-zero vision.

To learn about joining the GM team, visit our careers website.

]]>

Vehicle Safety

April 06, 2021

Electrifying Engineering episodes, which will be released every Sunday in English and Spanish through July 2020, are hosted by members of the GM team and will delve into a wide range of topics, including electric car charging, electric car motors, autonomous vehicle sensors and more. Each episode will feature an interactive engineering project designed for viewers to conduct in the comfort of their own homes, with everyday household items.

When the project is complete, viewers are encouraged to share a picture on social media using the hashtag #ElectrifyingEngineering.

As we all juggle changes to how we work and spend time with family, we hope to share what we hold to be true at General Motors – creativity and innovation know no bounds. From teachers finding new ways to stay in touch with their students, to automakers retooling plants to produce critical healthcare supplies, we’re all stepping up to face the challenge together.

It is possible to make a difference and we hope these videos will inspire the young, budding engineers of the future to help us reach our zero-zero-zero vision.

To learn about joining the GM team, visit our careers website.

]]>

Vehicle Safety

April 06, 2021

Electrifying Engineering episodes, which will be released every Sunday in English and Spanish through July 2020, are hosted by members of the GM team and will delve into a wide range of topics, including electric car charging, electric car motors, autonomous vehicle sensors and more. Each episode will feature an interactive engineering project designed for viewers to conduct in the comfort of their own homes, with everyday household items.

When the project is complete, viewers are encouraged to share a picture on social media using the hashtag #ElectrifyingEngineering.

As we all juggle changes to how we work and spend time with family, we hope to share what we hold to be true at General Motors – creativity and innovation know no bounds. From teachers finding new ways to stay in touch with their students, to automakers retooling plants to produce critical healthcare supplies, we’re all stepping up to face the challenge together.

It is possible to make a difference and we hope these videos will inspire the young, budding engineers of the future to help us reach our zero-zero-zero vision.

To learn about joining the GM team, visit our careers website.

]]>

Path to Autonomous

April 04, 2021

We're pushing transportation options beyond our wildest imaginations with autonomous vehicles.

Path to Autonomous

April 04, 2021

We're pushing transportation options beyond our wildest imaginations with autonomous vehicles.

FR: Follow us on

GM Home URL
FR: Supplier Code of Conduct FR: GM Terms of Use GM SupplyPower Overview
Help View Security Administrators

GM.Com | GM Media Site
© General Motors